Movie analysis: Sharks of the Corn (2021)

Wiki Article



Are you up for an adrenaline-pumping ride through shark-infested cornfields? Put on your seat, because "Sharks of the Corn" is here to deliver an exciting mix of horror and comedy. The film was directed by the famous Tim Ritter, this ultra low-budget flick draws on Stephen King's classic "Children of the Corn" (1984) as it transforms into a hilarious and bizarre comedy that'll have your both scratching your head and squatting on the ground to laugh.

An Cornfield Carnival of Chaos


From the very first moment in what appears to be a normal-looking cornfield "Sharks of the Corn" shows its quirky side. The film introduces Gary and Susan in the film, two characters who quickly fade into the background while the movie drifts off into unexpected direction. The plot weaves together gore aspects with plenty of subplots. It's a pleasing blend that can be called a cornfield carnival full of craziness.



An Mentally-ill Shark Enthusiast


In comes Teddy Bo Lucas, a character that adds an extra twist to an already awe-inspiring plot. The psychotic shark enthusiast is an obsession that is unnatural with creatures of the sea. And if that weren't enough bizarre, Teddy takes his obsession to another level when his shocking act of murder occurs inside his motel room. This surprising twist sets the stage for a whirlwind of intrigue and suspicion.

Consensus, Cults as well as Sharks


The plot develops further as authorities put the blame on Gary, a poor Gary for the murder of Susan, even though there is no motive. The cult of sharks takes over as a distinct part of the story, leading us into an alternate world in which corn fields and the cult of sharks collide. Just when you think things couldn't get any crazier then two inept burglars set out to snatch a shark's pup from this community. It's a bizarre mix suspense and humor that keeps people on their toes.

Critiques and Comic Relief


While "Sharks of the Corn" provides an original and refreshing entertainment, it's certainly not without it's flaws. The film is often a (blog) jumble of different characters and scenes, which can leave viewers confused and unable to keep track of the multiple plotlines. It's a deliberate stylistic choice that adds to the spoof quality of the movie, but it's not every person's cup of tea.

Its production values are film are deliberately low as is the acting, which falls into the category of unreliable. The film is nevertheless amidst a sea that is filled with poor acting, Steve Guynn shines through with his exemplary performance, realizing his character instead of being merely repeating phrases. This is a rare example of true acting in a sea of overblown performances.

Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines


"Sharks of the Corn" makes use of low-budget, unpretentious effects that hold an appealing charm. Most of the shark attacks will be slapstick portrayed with hand-made (blog post) puppets that add an element of absurdity the film. A bizarre storyline that centers about a shark-cult's attempt to revive the goddess of sharks this is where the film completely unleashes its wit. This creativity, however, often doesn't translate into an enjoyable and enjoyable experience.

Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional


The one area in which "Sharks of the Corn" fails is the cinematography. The frame and the visuals come in a tinier way, lacking polished and refined look that's often seen typical of mainstream horror films. While this could be an intentional decision to maintain the low-budget aesthetic this does affect the quality of the experience.

To conclude "Sharks of the Corn" is an acquired gastronomic experience. It's an uninteresting and slow mixture of stories that can be hard to make sense of. Its poor production value confusion in plotlines and uncertain acting are likely to turn off the viewers in search of a refined horror comedy experience. Although it's a good choice for anyone who likes low-quality entertainment films "Sharks of the Corn" does not deliver what they expected in terms of hilarity.

Final Rating"Stock Footage Overlay" - One "Stock Footage Overlay" Out of Five


Due to its poor quality video, actor, sound and edits "Sharks of the Corn" fails to hit the right note. Despite the potential for a riotously fun spoof film, it fails to provide a coherent (blog) and enjoyable user experience. As a critic, I concluding with a humorous note: like corn, will only become better by adding explosions. Unfortunately, "Sharks of the Corn" isn't quite up to the grade.

Report this wiki page